Skip to content
Oshki

For students

You don’t need to have done this before.

For medical, dental, nursing, pharmacy, and public-health students running a thesis, a student scientific circle project, or a first case report.
Join the waitlist

Why a first project is hard

Four things that stall a first study.

  1. 01Not knowing where to start, or whether the idea is even a study yet.
  2. 02Unsure the methodology and reporting are right — and no one to ask at midnight.
  3. 03No institutional SPSS or Qualtrics licence, or one that feels intimidating to open.
  4. 04Never sure which reporting guideline the study needs, or what it asks for.

A guided starting point

Bring a question. Leave with a design.

Intake asks what your study needs to define, shows the closest published work, and tells you honestly whether the idea is viable as stated — with a concrete way to fix it if not.

Intake — start from an idea

What do you want to find out?

Closest published studiesPubMed + OpenAlex

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

Always know what’s next

The guideline and the next task, side by side.

Each stage explains what it’s for in plain language, shows what the reporting guideline asks for, and lists the concrete tasks left — so “what do I do now?” always has an answer.

Sleep quality and exam stress in medical students

Cross-sectional surveySTROBEStage 3 of 5

Sleep quality and exam stress in medical students

Data collection84 / 120 responses

STROBE checklist

6 of 22 addressed

  • 1Title and abstract
  • 2Background / rationale
  • 3Objectives
  • 4Study design
  • 5Setting
  • 6Participants
  • 7Variables
  • 8Data sources / measurement

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

AI assists, you decide

Help writing up — without losing authorship.

AI drafts from your own protocol and results and never invents numbers or citations. You review every draft, and you make every methodological call you’ll need to defend.

Write-up — Results

Analysis

Spearman's ρ0.41
95% CI[0.21, 0.58]
p< .001
n84

Re-run on 84 responses

Draft · Results

AI-assisted · not inserted yet

Of 84 respondents, poorer sleep quality was moderately associated with higher perceived stress during the exam period (Spearman’s ρ = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21, 0.58], p < .001).

AcceptEditDrafted from your analysis — never invented.

Illustrative preview — fictional study, not real data.

Join the waitlist

Be first in when Oshki opens.

Two minutes: your role, the study you’re on or planning next, and the tools you use today. Optionally, a 15-minute call to tell us what’s missing.

  • — For medical & health-science students and researchers
  • — No launch date yet; we’ll email you when there is
  • — No spam. Unsubscribe or ask for deletion any time

Waitlist form not connected yet

Set TALLY_FORM_ID in lib/constants.ts to embed the Tally form here.